Celeron N2815 vs Phenom X3 8250e

Celeron N2815 vs Phenom X3 8250e Performance Spectrum

Celeron N2815

2 / 2

1,068

0.0%

1,084

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2815 vs Phenom X3 8250e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2815 vs Phenom X3 8250e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2815

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Phenom X3 8250e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,068 vs 1,084).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).

Phenom X3 8250e

2008

Why buy it

✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Trade-offs

❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2815 better than Phenom X3 8250e?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2815 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8250e pulls ahead with 1.5% better PassMark. Phenom X3 8250e also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X3 8250e is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 3 cores and 3 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2815 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2815 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2815 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2815 vs Phenom X3 8250e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2815

The Celeron N2815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,068 points. Launch price was $107.

Phenom X3 8250e

The Phenom X3 8250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toliman (2008) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,084 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2815 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X3 8250e offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Phenom X3 8250e has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Celeron N2815 versus 1.9 GHz on the Phenom X3 8250e — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Celeron N2815. The Celeron N2815 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses Toliman (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2815 scores 1,068 against the Phenom X3 8250e's 1,084 — a 1.5% lead for the Phenom X3 8250e. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron N2815 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X3 8250e.

Feature	Celeron N2815	Phenom X3 8250e
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock	2.13 GHz+12%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Toliman (2008)
PassMark	1,068	1,084+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom X3 8250e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N2815	Phenom X3 8250e
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N2815) / not specified (Phenom X3 8250e). The Celeron N2815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Phenom X3 8250e requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N2815 rivals AMD A4-1250.