Celeron N3150 vs Pentium T4400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3150 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3150 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3150

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), while Pentium T4400 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium T4400

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,177).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Celeron N3150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3150 better than Pentium T4400?

Yes. Celeron N3150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3150 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N3150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium T4400 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (11.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA478.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3150 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3150

The Celeron N3150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,177 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3150 is built on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron N3150 scores 1,177 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N3150. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3150 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.

Feature	Celeron N3150	Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	—
Boost Clock	2.08 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz+38%
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	—
PassMark	1,177	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	—	249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3150 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3150 versus DDR3-800 on the Pentium T4400 — the Celeron N3150 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3150) vs 0 (Pentium T4400) — the Celeron N3150 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3150) and GL40,GM45 (Pentium T4400).

Feature	Celeron N3150	Pentium T4400
Socket	FCBGA1170	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+100%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3150) vs None (Pentium T4400). The Celeron N3150 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)), while the Pentium T4400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron N3150 rivals AMD E2-7110; Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.