Celeron N3150 vs Xeon 5130

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3150 vs Xeon 5130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3150 vs Xeon 5130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3150

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), while Xeon 5130 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon 5130

2006

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,177).
❌Launch MSRP is still $316 MSRP, while Celeron N3150 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3150 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3150 better than Xeon 5130?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5130 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N3150 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N3150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3150 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 5130 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Celeron N3150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $316 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 5130 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3150 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3150 vs Xeon 5130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3150

The Celeron N3150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.08 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,177 points. Launch price was $107.

Xeon 5130

The Xeon 5130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3150 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon 5130 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N3150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3150 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon 5130 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N3150 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron N3150 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 5130 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3150 scores 1,177 against the Xeon 5130's 1,175 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N3150. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N3150	Xeon 5130
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.08 GHz+4%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,177	1,175

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3150 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5130 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3150	Xeon 5130
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3150) / not specified (Xeon 5130). The Celeron N3150 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)), while the Xeon 5130 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3150 rivals AMD E2-7110.