Celeron 3755U vs Celeron N3150

The Celeron 3755U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N3150 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N3150 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3755U versus 2.08 GHz on the Celeron N3150 — a 20.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3150 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 3755U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron N3150 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3755U scores 1,182 against the Celeron N3150's 1,177 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 3755U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3755U vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3150.

The Celeron 3755U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3150 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3755U versus 1600 on the Celeron N3150 — the Celeron N3150 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3755U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3755U) vs 4 (Celeron N3150) — the Celeron 3755U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3755U) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3150).

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U) vs true (Celeron N3150). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3755U) and Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Celeron N3150) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U; Celeron N3150 rivals AMD E2-7110.