Celeron 3755U vs Celeron G465

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3755U vs Celeron G465 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3755U vs Celeron G465: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3755U

2015

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,182 vs 1,185).

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while Celeron 3755U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G465 better than Celeron 3755U?

Yes. Celeron G465 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G465 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G465 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G465 is the better buy right now. Celeron G465 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $70 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3755U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1.5 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3755U vs Celeron G465 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3755U

The Celeron 3755U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3755U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G465 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 3755U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3755U versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G465 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Celeron 3755U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G465 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3755U scores 1,182 against the Celeron G465's 1,185 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G465. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3755U vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465.

Feature	Celeron 3755U	Celeron G465
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	1.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	1.9 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+33%	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,182	1,185
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	625	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3755U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G465 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3755U versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 — the Celeron 3755U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 3755U) vs 16 (Celeron G465) — the Celeron G465 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3755U) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465).

Feature	Celeron 3755U	Celeron G465
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12	16+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U) vs VT-x (Celeron G465). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3755U) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G465) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget, Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U; Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron 3755U	Celeron G465
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Broadwell)	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget