Celeron 3755U vs Pentium A1018

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3755U vs Pentium A1018 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3755U vs Pentium A1018: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3755U

2015

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Pentium A1018 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,182 vs 1,188).

Pentium A1018

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Celeron 3755U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3755U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium A1018 better than Celeron 3755U?

Yes. Pentium A1018 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium A1018 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium A1018 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium A1018 is the better buy right now. Pentium A1018 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $132 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3755U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3755U vs Pentium A1018 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3755U

The Celeron 3755U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium A1018

The Pentium A1018 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,188 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3755U and Pentium A1018 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron 3755U is built on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 3755U scores 1,182 against the Pentium A1018's 1,188 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium A1018. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3755U vs 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium A1018.

Feature	Celeron 3755U	Pentium A1018
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	2.1 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	—
PassMark	1,182	1,188
Geekbench 6 Multi	625	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3755U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium A1018 uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3755U	Pentium A1018
Socket	FCBGA1168	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U) / not specified (Pentium A1018). The Celeron 3755U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium A1018 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U.