Celeron 3755U
VS
Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Celeron 3755U vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Intel

Celeron 3755U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2015
VS
AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 3755U is positioned at rank 348 and the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is on rank 561, so the Celeron 3755U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 3755U

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
99%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
97%
#336
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
496%
#337
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
489%
#338
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
449%
#339
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
447%
#340
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
443%
#342
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
428%
#343
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
410%
#344
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
409%
#345
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
398%
#348
Celeron 3755U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion 64 X2 TL-50

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
99%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
98%
#549
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
743%
#550
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
732%
#551
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
672%
#552
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
669%
#553
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
663%
#555
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
640%
#556
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
614%
#557
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
613%
#558
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
597%
#561
Turion 64 X2 TL-50
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 3755U (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 3755UTurion 64 X2 TL-50
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Taylor (2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 (2006) relies on 90 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 3755UTurion 64 X2 TL-50
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 3755U and Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Intel

Celeron 3755U

The Celeron 3755U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,182 points. Launch price was $107.

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3755U and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron 3755U versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Celeron 3755U. The Celeron 3755U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3755U scores 1,182 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.2% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-50.

FeatureCeleron 3755UTurion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz+6%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
14 nm-84%
90 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-U (2015)
Taylor (2006)
PassMark
1,182
1,184
Geekbench 6 Multi
625
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3755U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 3755UTurion 64 X2 TL-50
Socket
FCBGA1168
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3755U) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-50). The Celeron 3755U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3755U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3755U rivals Pentium 3825U.

FeatureCeleron 3755UTurion 64 X2 TL-50
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget