Celeron N3160
VS
Pentium E5800

Celeron N3160 vs Pentium E5800

Intel

Celeron N3160

4 Cores4 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.24 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Pentium E5800

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N3160 is positioned at rank 697 and the Pentium E5800 is on rank 821, so the Celeron N3160 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3160

#685
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
982%
#686
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
968%
#687
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
888%
#688
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
884%
#689
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
876%
#691
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
846%
#692
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
811%
#693
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
810%
#694
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
788%
#697
Celeron N3160
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#705
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#712
Core i7-10850H
MSRP: $395|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E5800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16768%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15844%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11504%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3466%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2745%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2402%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1375%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1358%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1236%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1236%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1222%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1189%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1173%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1168%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1157%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3160 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N3160Pentium E5800
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Braswell (2015−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium E5800 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N3160Pentium E5800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N3160 and Pentium E5800

Intel

Celeron N3160

The Celeron N3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Intel

Pentium E5800

The Pentium E5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 November 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $68.

Processing Power

The Celeron N3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium E5800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N3160 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3160 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E5800 — a 35.3% clock advantage for the Pentium E5800 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron N3160 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3160 scores 1,195 against the Pentium E5800's 1,190 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N3160. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N3160Pentium E5800
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.24 GHz
3.2 GHz+43%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Braswell (2015−2016)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,195
1,190
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N3160Pentium E5800
Socket
FCBGA1170
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron N3160) / not specified (Pentium E5800). The Celeron N3160 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Pentium E5800 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron N3160 rivals AMD E2-9010.

FeatureCeleron N3160Pentium E5800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true