A6-5350M vs Celeron N3160

A6-5350M vs Celeron N3160 Performance Spectrum

A6-5350M

2 / 2

1,199

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N3160

4 / 4

1,195

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5350M vs Celeron N3160 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5350M vs Celeron N3160: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5350M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Celeron N3160

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,195 vs 1,199).

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5350M better than Celeron N3160?

Yes. A6-5350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5350M still makes the most sense overall. A6-5350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3160 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5350M vs Celeron N3160 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5350M

The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron N3160

The Celeron N3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5350M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N3160 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N3160 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3160 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the A6-5350M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3160 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Celeron N3160's 1,195 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-5350M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-5350M	Celeron N3160
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+56%	2.24 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+81%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,199	1,195
Geekbench 6 Single	323	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3160 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A6-5350M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5350M) vs 4 (Celeron N3160) — the A6-5350M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-5350M	Celeron N3160
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5350M) vs true (Celeron N3160). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8450G (A6-5350M) and Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3160) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M; Celeron N3160 rivals AMD E2-9010.