A6-5350M vs Athlon 64 FX-60

A6-5350M vs Athlon 64 FX-60 Performance Spectrum

A6-5350M

2 / 2

1,199

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 FX-60

2 / 2

1,205

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5350M vs Athlon 64 FX-60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5350M vs Athlon 64 FX-60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5350M

2013

Why buy it

✅+29.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 110W, a 75W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8450G, while Athlon 64 FX-60 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,199 vs 1,205).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 FX-60.

Athlon 64 FX-60

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike A6-5350M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 323).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,031 MSRP, while A6-5350M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌214.3% higher power demand at 110W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5350M better than Athlon 64 FX-60?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-5350M is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-60 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5350M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-5350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,031 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 FX-60 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on 939.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5350M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5350M vs Athlon 64 FX-60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5350M

The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon 64 FX-60

The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5350M and Athlon 64 FX-60 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the A6-5350M. The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses Toledo (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Athlon 64 FX-60's 1,205 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-60. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 323 vs 250, a 25.5% lead for the A6-5350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-5350M	Athlon 64 FX-60
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+35%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB	2 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Toledo (2006)
PassMark	1,199	1,205
Geekbench 6 Single	323+29%	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	480

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5350M versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 — the A6-5350M supports -500% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5350M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5350M) vs 0 (Athlon 64 FX-60) — the A6-5350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-5350M	Athlon 64 FX-60
Socket	FS1r2	939
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR-400
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+700%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon 64 FX-60 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5350M) vs None (Athlon 64 FX-60). The A6-5350M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8450G), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop, Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M.