CPU
GPU
A6-5350M
Athlon 64 FX-60
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5350M is positioned at rank 885 and the Athlon 64 FX-60 is on rank 1119, so the A6-5350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-5350M
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-60
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-5350M | Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Toledo (2006) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-5350M | Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-5350M and Athlon 64 FX-60
A6-5350M
The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.
Athlon 64 FX-60
The Athlon 64 FX-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Toledo (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,205 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A6-5350M and Athlon 64 FX-60 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-60 — a 29.5% clock advantage for the A6-5350M. The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses Toledo (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Athlon 64 FX-60's 1,205 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-60. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 323 vs 250, a 25.5% lead for the A6-5350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+35% | 2.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 2 MB |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Toledo (2006) |
| PassMark | 1,199 | 1,205 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 323+29% | 250 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 480 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5350M versus DDR-400 on the Athlon 64 FX-60 — the A6-5350M supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5350M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5350M) vs 0 (Athlon 64 FX-60) — the A6-5350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | 939 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR-400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+700% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon 64 FX-60 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5350M) vs None (Athlon 64 FX-60). The A6-5350M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8450G), while the Athlon 64 FX-60 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop, Athlon 64 FX-60 targets Gaming/Enthusiast. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Athlon 64 FX-60 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8450G | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Gaming/Enthusiast |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-5350M and Athlon 64 FX-60
