A6-5350M vs Celeron J3355
A6-5350M
Celeron J3355
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5350M is positioned at rank 885 and the Celeron J3355 is on rank 425, so the Celeron J3355 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-5350M
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J3355
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-5350M | Celeron J3355 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-5350M | Celeron J3355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-5350M and Celeron J3355
A6-5350M
The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron J3355
The Celeron J3355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,203 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the A6-5350M and Celeron J3355 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron J3355 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the A6-5350M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J3355 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Celeron J3355's 1,203 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J3355. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 323 vs 450, a 32.9% lead for the Celeron J3355 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Celeron J3355 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+40% | 2.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| PassMark | 1,199 | 1,203 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 323 | 450+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 850 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J3355 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-5350M versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J3355 — the Celeron J3355 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-5350M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5350M) vs 6 (Celeron J3355) — the A6-5350M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Celeron J3355 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | FCBGA1296 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2400+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+167% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5350M) vs VT-x (Celeron J3355). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8450G (A6-5350M) and HD Graphics 500 (Celeron J3355) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron J3355 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M; Celeron J3355 rivals Pentium J4205.
| Feature | A6-5350M | Celeron J3355 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8450G | HD Graphics 500 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Low Power |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-5350M and Celeron J3355
