A6-5350M vs Core i7-680UM

A6-5350M vs Core i7-680UM Performance Spectrum

A6-5350M

2 / 2

1,199

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-680UM

2 / 4

1,196

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5350M vs Core i7-680UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5350M vs Core i7-680UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5350M

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8450G, while Core i7-680UM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

Core i7-680UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,196 vs 1,199).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5350M better than Core i7-680UM?

Yes. A6-5350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5350M still makes the most sense overall. A6-5350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5350M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5350M vs Core i7-680UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5350M

The A6-5350M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,199 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-5350M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-680UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the A6-5350M versus 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM — a 32.2% clock advantage for the A6-5350M (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The A6-5350M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-680UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5350M scores 1,199 against the Core i7-680UM's 1,196 — a 0.3% lead for the A6-5350M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5350M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM.

Feature	A6-5350M	Core i7-680UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz+38%	2.53 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+99%	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2048 kB+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,199	1,196
Geekbench 6 Single	323	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5350M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-680UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-5350M	Core i7-680UM
Socket	FS1r2	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-5350M) / not specified (Core i7-680UM). The A6-5350M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8450G), while the Core i7-680UM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5350M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5350M rivals Core i3-3110M.