
Celeron N3160

Ryzen 5 5600
Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 5 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Dead by Daylight
Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 5 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron N3160
2016Why buy it
- β Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Ryzen 5 5600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 5600 across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,195 vs 21,550).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 5600.
Ryzen 5 5600
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +637.5% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Celeron N3160.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Celeron N3160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron N3160 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 5600 better than Celeron N3160?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 5 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3160
The Celeron N3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015β2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.


Ryzen 5 5600
The Ryzen 5 5600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,550 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Ryzen 5 5600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3160 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 5600 β a 65.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 5600 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron N3160 uses the Braswell (2015β2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses Vermeer (2020β2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3160 scores 1,195 against the Ryzen 5 5600's 21,550 β a 179% lead for the Ryzen 5 5600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3160 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Celeron N3160 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 2.24 GHz | 4.4 GHz+96% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz+119% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Braswell (2015β2016) | Vermeer (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 1,195 | 21,550+1703% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 11,077 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,052 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 8,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 5600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3160 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 5600 β the Ryzen 5 5600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 5600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3160) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 5600) β the Ryzen 5 5600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3160) and B550,X570,B450,X470,A520 (Ryzen 5 5600).
| Feature | Celeron N3160 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 5600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3160) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 5600). The Celeron N3160 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Ryzen 5 5600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 5600 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron N3160 rivals AMD E2-9010.
| Feature | Celeron N3160 | Ryzen 5 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 400 | β |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













