Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum

Celeron N3160

4 / 4

1,195

0.0%

34,293

+2769.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3160

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 120W, a 116W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,195 vs 34,293).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1170, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +839.2% higher average FPS across 26 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1170 and older memory support.
✅600% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Celeron N3160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2900% higher power demand at 120W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Celeron N3160?

Yes. Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 839.2% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2769.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 839.2% more average FPS across 26 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 96 MB versus null.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the stronger fit. You are getting 2769.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 7800X3D comes in at an unclear MSRP at $449 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 839.2% average FPS lead across 26 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7800X3D makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1170, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 96 MB L3 cache instead of null, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron N3160 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3160

The Celeron N3160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N3160 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.24 GHz on the Celeron N3160 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — a 76.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 1.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Celeron N3160 uses the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3160 scores 1,195 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 — a 186.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3160 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Feature	Celeron N3160	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	2.24 GHz	5 GHz+123%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+175%
L3 Cache	0 kB	96 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Braswell (2015−2016)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	1,195	34,293+2770%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	15,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3160 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Celeron N3160 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 225% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N3160) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCBGA1170 (Celeron N3160) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).

Feature	Celeron N3160	Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Socket	FCBGA1170	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	1600	DDR5-5200+225%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	128 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	4	28+600%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Celeron N3160) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 400 (Celeron N3160) and AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Celeron N3160 rivals AMD E2-9010; Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.