Celeron T1600
VS
Celeron E1500

Celeron T1600 vs Celeron E1500

VS
Intel

Celeron E1500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T1600 is positioned at rank 1173 and the Celeron E1500 is on rank 907, so the Celeron E1500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1600

#1161
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4392%
#1162
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4328%
#1163
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3973%
#1164
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3955%
#1165
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3919%
#1167
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3784%
#1168
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3629%
#1169
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3623%
#1170
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3525%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
100%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
100%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
98%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
97%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
97%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
97%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
94%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
92%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
91%
#1187
Core i3-3217UE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
91%
#1188
Celeron T3000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $54
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21602%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20412%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
14821%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4465%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3537%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3094%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1772%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1749%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1592%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1592%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1574%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1532%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1511%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1504%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1491%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#907
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
100%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
100%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
99%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
98%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
98%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
98%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
98%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
98%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
97%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
97%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
97%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron E1500 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron T1600 in both compute-intensive tasks (6.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron E1500 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 67% cheaper ($5 vs $15) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+221%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T1600 and Celeron E1500

Intel

Celeron T1600

The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron E1500

The Celeron E1500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 November 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $63.

Processing Power

The Celeron E1500 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1600 scores 715 against the Celeron E1500's 765 — a 6.8% lead for the Celeron E1500. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1500.

FeatureCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
2.2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (total)
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
715
765+7%
Geekbench 6 Single
285
Geekbench 6 Multi
515
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E1500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
Socket
PGA478
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T1600) / No (Celeron E1500). Primary use case: Celeron E1500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1500 rivals Pentium E2200.

FeatureCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron T1600 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Celeron E1500 debuted at $53. At current prices ($15 vs $5), the Celeron E1500 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T1600 delivers 47.7 pts/$ vs 153.0 pts/$ for the Celeron E1500 — making the Celeron E1500 the 105% better value option.

FeatureCeleron T1600Celeron E1500
MSRP
$107
$53-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$5-67%
Performance per Dollar
47.7
153.0+221%
Release Date
2008
2008