Celeron T1600 vs Celeron N3010
Celeron T1600
Celeron N3010
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T1600 is positioned at rank 1173 and the Celeron N3010 is on rank 1164, so the Celeron N3010 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1600
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3010
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Airmont (2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+594%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T1600 and Celeron N3010
Celeron T1600
The Celeron T1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 715 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron N3010
The Celeron N3010 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.04 GHz, with boost up to 2.24 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 735 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Celeron N3010 is built on the Airmont (2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1600 scores 715 against the Celeron N3010's 735 — a 2.8% lead for the Celeron N3010. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1600 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3010.
| Feature | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2.24 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.66 GHz+60% | 1.04 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | — | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | — | Airmont (2016) |
| PassMark | 715 | 735+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron T1600 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3010 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T1600) / true (Celeron N3010). The Celeron N3010 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Celeron T1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3010 targets Budget Mobile.
| Feature | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Budget Mobile |
Value Analysis
The Celeron T1600 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Celeron N3010 debuted at $107.
| Feature | Celeron T1600 | Celeron N3010 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107 | $107 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron T1600 and Celeron N3010
