Celeron T1700
VS
Celeron 1000M

Celeron T1700 vs Celeron 1000M

VS
Intel

Celeron 1000M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T1700 is positioned at rank 1014 and the Celeron 1000M is on rank 1026, so the Celeron T1700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1700

#1002
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2218%
#1003
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2185%
#1004
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2006%
#1005
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1997%
#1006
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1979%
#1008
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1911%
#1009
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1832%
#1010
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1829%
#1011
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1780%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
99%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
96%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
96%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
95%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
94%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1000M

#1014
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2359%
#1015
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2324%
#1016
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2133%
#1017
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2124%
#1018
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2104%
#1020
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2032%
#1021
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1949%
#1022
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1945%
#1023
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1893%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
98%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
96%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
95%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 1000M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron T1700 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron T1700 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $86), it costs 94% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 1601% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron 1000M.
InsightCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+1601%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T1700 and Celeron 1000M

Intel

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron 1000M

The Celeron 1000M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,070 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1000M is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1700 scores 1,058 against the Celeron 1000M's 1,070 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron 1000M. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1000M.

FeatureCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz+2%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,058
1,070+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1000M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
Socket
PGA478
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

The Celeron 1000M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Celeron T1700 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron T1700 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Celeron 1000M debuted at $86.

FeatureCeleron T1700Celeron 1000M
MSRP
$80-7%
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$5
Release Date
2008
2013