Celeron T1700 vs Xeon 5110

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T1700 vs Xeon 5110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T1700 vs Xeon 5110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 5110, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Xeon 5110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon 5110

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,058).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T1700 better than Xeon 5110?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron T1700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T1700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T1700 is the better buy right now. Celeron T1700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron T1700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2006). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron T1700 vs Xeon 5110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon 5110

The Xeon 5110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $20.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 5110 is built on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1700 scores 1,058 against the Xeon 5110's 1,055 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T1700. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700 vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5110.

Feature	Celeron T1700	Xeon 5110
Cores / Threads	—	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.83 GHz+14%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	4 MB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	—	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,058	1,055

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon 5110 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.