Celeron T1700
VS
Pentium 3560Y

Celeron T1700 vs Pentium 3560Y

VS
Intel

Pentium 3560Y

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron T1700 is positioned at rank 1014 and the Pentium 3560Y is on rank 1160, so the Celeron T1700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron T1700

#1002
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2218%
#1003
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2185%
#1004
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2006%
#1005
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1997%
#1006
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1979%
#1008
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1911%
#1009
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1832%
#1010
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1829%
#1011
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1780%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
100%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
100%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
99%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
99%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
96%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
96%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
95%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
94%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3560Y

#1147
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4174%
#1148
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4112%
#1149
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3775%
#1150
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3758%
#1151
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3724%
#1153
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3596%
#1154
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3448%
#1155
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3442%
#1156
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3350%
#1159
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1160
Pentium 3560Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
96%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1172
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1173
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium 3560Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron T1700 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron T1700Pentium 3560Y
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron T1700Pentium 3560Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron T1700 and Pentium 3560Y

Intel

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 3560Y

The Pentium 3560Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Pentium 3560Y is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1700 scores 1,058 against the Pentium 3560Y's 1,055 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T1700. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3560Y.

FeatureCeleron T1700Pentium 3560Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz+53%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,058
1,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3560Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron T1700Pentium 3560Y
Socket
PGA478
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%