Celeron T1700 vs Pentium 3560Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T1700 vs Pentium 3560Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T1700 vs Pentium 3560Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while Pentium 3560Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3560Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 1,058).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T1700 better than Pentium 3560Y?

Yes. Celeron T1700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T1700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T1700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T1700 is the better buy right now. Celeron T1700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $80 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3560Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron T1700 vs Pentium 3560Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium 3560Y

The Pentium 3560Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Pentium 3560Y is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron T1700 scores 1,058 against the Pentium 3560Y's 1,055 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T1700. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700 vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3560Y.

Feature	Celeron T1700	Pentium 3560Y
Cores / Threads	—	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.83 GHz+53%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	—	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,058	1,055

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron T1700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3560Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.