Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron T1700

Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron T1700 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240

2 / 2

1,060

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron T1700

1,058

0.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron T1700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron T1700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Celeron T1700.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Celeron T1700

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,058 vs 1,060).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.2 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 240 better than Celeron T1700?

Yes. Athlon II X2 240 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 240 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 240 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 240 is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 240 comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 33.6% better value on MSRP (17.7 vs 13.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II X2 240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron T1700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240

The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.

Celeron T1700

The Celeron T1700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 240 is built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240 scores 1,060 against the Celeron T1700's 1,058 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 240. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T1700.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Celeron T1700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	—
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+53%	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB	—
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	—
PassMark	1,060	1,058
Geekbench 6 Single	373	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T1700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Celeron T1700
Socket	AM3	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240) / not specified (Celeron T1700). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Celeron T1700
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 240 was priced at $60, while the Celeron T1700 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($60 vs $80), Athlon II X2 240 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240 delivers 17.7 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T1700 — making the Athlon II X2 240 the 28.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240	Celeron T1700
MSRP	$60-25%	$80
Performance per Dollar	17.7+34%	13.2
Release Date	2009	2008

Search Athlon II X2 240 on Amazon

Search Celeron T1700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.