Athlon II X2 240
Celeron G530T
Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G530T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G530T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G530T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 240
2009Why buy it
- ✅+6.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (373 vs 384).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.7 vs 21.1 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G530T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron G530T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+2.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 17.7 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Athlon II X2 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (655 vs 700).
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G530T better than Athlon II X2 240?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 240 vs Celeron G530T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X2 240
The Athlon II X2 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,060 points. Launch price was $35.
Celeron G530T
The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 240 and Celeron G530T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon II X2 240 uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G530T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240 scores 1,060 against the Celeron G530T's 1,056 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X2 240. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 373 vs 384, a 2.9% lead for the Celeron G530T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 700 vs 655 (6.6% advantage for the Athlon II X2 240). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 240 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530T.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,060 | 1,056 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 373 | 384+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 700+7% | 655 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 240 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G530T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II X2 240 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G530T — the Celeron G530T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 760G,785G,790GX,880G,890GX (Athlon II X2 240) and H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3-1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 240) vs VT-x (Celeron G530T). The Celeron G530T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II X2 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 240 targets Desktop, Celeron G530T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240 rivals Pentium E5400; Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 240 was priced at $60, while the Celeron G530T came in at $50. On launch pricing ($60 vs $50), Celeron G530T was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240 delivers 17.7 pts/$ vs 21.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G530T — making the Celeron G530T the 17.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 240 | Celeron G530T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $50-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.7 | 21.1+19% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 240 and Celeron G530T
