Celeron T3000 vs Celeron T3100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron T3000 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron T3000 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron T3000

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron T3100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (905 vs 945).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).

Celeron T3100

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $88 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 152.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3100 better than Celeron T3000?

Yes. Celeron T3100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 4.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3100 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.4% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T3100 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3100 comes in $88 cheaper on MSRP at $62 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 152.6% better value on MSRP (15.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron T3000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron T3000 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron T3000

The Celeron T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T3100

The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

In PassMark, the Celeron T3000 scores 905 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 4.3% lead for the Celeron T3100. Both processors carry 1 MB L2 Cache of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron T3000	Celeron T3100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	1.9 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache
Process	45 nm	45 nm
PassMark	905	945+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	650

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron T3000	Celeron T3100
Socket	PGA478	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron T3000) / None (Celeron T3100). Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop.

Feature	Celeron T3000	Celeron T3100
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	None
Target Use	—	Legacy Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron T3000 was priced at $150, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($150 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron T3000 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 86.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron T3000	Celeron T3100
MSRP	$150	$62-59%
Performance per Dollar	6.0	15.2+153%
Release Date	2009	2008

Search Celeron T3000 on Amazon

Search Celeron T3100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.