Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3000

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Costs $64 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 86.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Celeron T3000

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron P4600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (905 vs 965).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 11.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron P4600 better than Celeron T3000?

Yes. Celeron P4600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron P4600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron P4600 is the better buy right now. Celeron P4600 comes in $64 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 86.0% better value on MSRP (11.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron P4600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009), 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron P4600 vs Celeron T3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron T3000

The Celeron T3000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 905 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron P4600 and Celeron T3000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron P4600 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron P4600 scores 965 against the Celeron T3000's 905 — a 6.4% lead for the Celeron P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4600 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3000.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz+11%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Westmere (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	965+7%	905

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3000 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3000
Socket	PGA988	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Celeron P4600) / not specified (Celeron T3000). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Celeron T3000 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3000
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron P4600 was priced at $86, while the Celeron T3000 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($86 vs $150), Celeron P4600 was $64 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4600 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Celeron T3000 — making the Celeron P4600 the 60.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Celeron T3000
MSRP	$86-43%	$150
Performance per Dollar	11.2+87%	6.0
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Celeron P4600 on Amazon

Search Celeron T3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.