Celeron P4600
VS
Core 2 Duo E7200

Celeron P4600 vs Core 2 Duo E7200

Intel

Celeron P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron P4600 is positioned at rank 1050 and the Core 2 Duo E7200 is on rank 1040, so the Core 2 Duo E7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron P4600

#1038
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2615%
#1039
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2577%
#1040
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2365%
#1041
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2355%
#1042
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2333%
#1044
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2253%
#1045
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2160%
#1046
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2157%
#1047
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2099%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
99%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
97%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
96%
#1059
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
95%
#1060
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
95%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
95%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
94%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
94%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
41396%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
39116%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
28401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8556%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6777%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5929%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3396%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3351%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3052%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3051%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3017%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2936%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2895%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2883%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2857%
#1039
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
100%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
100%
#1042
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
98%
#1043
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
97%
#1044
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#1045
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
95%
#1046
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
94%
#1047
Core 2 Duo E8200
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1048
Core 2 Quad Q9450
MSRP: $316|Avg: $15
93%
#1049
Core 2 Duo E8600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $95
92%
#1050
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
91%
#1051
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
91%
#1052
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
90%
#1053
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
90%
#1054
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E7200 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron P4600 in both compute-intensive tasks (3.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($133)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron P4600 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $15 (vs $133), it costs 89% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 754% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core 2 Duo E7200.
InsightCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+754%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($133)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron P4600 and Core 2 Duo E7200

Intel

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E7200

The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron P4600 and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 184.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron P4600 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron P4600 scores 965 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 3.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7200. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4600 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200.

FeatureCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.1 GHz
2.53 GHz+2430%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.53 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
3 MB (total)+500%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Westmere (2010−2011)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
965
1,002+4%
Geekbench 6 Single
368
Geekbench 6 Multi
666
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4600 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron P4600 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4600) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).

FeatureCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1066+53200%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8
8 GB+104857500%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4600) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.

FeatureCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron P4600 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7200 debuted at $133. At current prices ($15 vs $133), the Celeron P4600 is $118 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4600 delivers 64.3 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7200 — making the Celeron P4600 the 158.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron P4600Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP
$86-35%
$133
Avg Price (30d)
$15-89%
$133
Performance per Dollar
64.3+757%
7.5
Release Date
2010
2008