
Celeron P4600 vs Core 2 Duo E7200

Celeron P4600

Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron P4600 is positioned at rank 1050 and the Core 2 Duo E7200 is on rank 1040, so the Core 2 Duo E7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron P4600
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+754%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron P4600 and Core 2 Duo E7200

Celeron P4600
The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E7200
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron P4600 and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 184.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron P4600 uses the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron P4600 scores 965 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 3.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7200. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4600 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200.
| Feature | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.53 GHz+2430% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.53 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 3 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Westmere (2010−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 965 | 1,002+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 368 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 666 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4600 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron P4600 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4600) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).
| Feature | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066+53200% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 | 8 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4600) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron P4600 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7200 debuted at $133. At current prices ($15 vs $133), the Celeron P4600 is $118 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4600 delivers 64.3 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7200 — making the Celeron P4600 the 158.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron P4600 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-35% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-89% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.3+757% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















