Celeron P4600 vs Pentium E2180

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron P4600 vs Pentium E2180 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron P4600 vs Pentium E2180: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Westmere), while Pentium E2180 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
2.4% HIGHER MSRP
$86 MSRPvs$84 MSRP

Pentium E2180

2007

Why buy it

✅Costs $2 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (938 vs 965).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron P4600 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron P4600 better than Pentium E2180?

Yes. Celeron P4600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 2.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron P4600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron P4600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron P4600 is the better buy right now. Celeron P4600 comes in 2.4% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.5% better value on MSRP (11.2 vs 11.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron P4600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron P4600 vs Pentium E2180 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E2180

The Pentium E2180 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 938 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron P4600 is built on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron P4600 scores 965 against the Pentium E2180's 938 — a 2.8% lead for the Celeron P4600. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron P4600 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium E2180.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Pentium E2180
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	0.1 GHz	—
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	—
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Westmere (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	965+3%	938

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron P4600 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E2180 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Celeron P4600 versus 800 on the Pentium E2180 — the Celeron P4600 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Pentium E2180
Socket	PGA988	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1066+33%	800
Max RAM Capacity	8	8
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: true (Celeron P4600) vs false (Pentium E2180). The Celeron P4600 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)), while the Pentium E2180 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Pentium E2180
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	false

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron P4600 was priced at $86, while the Pentium E2180 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($86 vs $84), Pentium E2180 was $2 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron P4600 delivers 11.2 pts/$ vs 11.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E2180 — making the Celeron P4600 the 0.5% better value option.

Feature	Celeron P4600	Pentium E2180
MSRP	$86	$84-2%
Performance per Dollar	11.2	11.2
Release Date	2010	2007

Search Celeron P4600 on Amazon

Search Pentium E2180 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.