A6-7000 vs Celeron P4600

CPU

GPU

A6-7000

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 3 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron P4600

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 0.1 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A6-7000 vs Celeron P4600 Performance Spectrum

A6-7000

2 / 2

1,002

+3.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron P4600

2 / 2

965

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7000 vs Celeron P4600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7000 vs Celeron P4600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7000

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 11.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Celeron P4600

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7000 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (965 vs 1,002).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7000 better than Celeron P4600?

Yes. A6-7000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 3.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-7000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-7000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7000 comes in 16.3% more expensive on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron P4600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 12.0% better value on paper (11.2 vs 10.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-7000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7000 vs Celeron P4600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7000

The A6-7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron P4600

The Celeron P4600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Westmere (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 0.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 965 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-7000 and Celeron P4600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the A6-7000 versus 0.1 GHz on the Celeron P4600 — a 187.1% clock advantage for the A6-7000 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A6-7000 uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron P4600 uses Westmere (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7000 scores 1,002 against the Celeron P4600's 965 — a 3.8% lead for the A6-7000.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron P4600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+2900%	0.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+10%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB
L2 Cache	1024 kB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Westmere (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,002+4%	965

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron P4600 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the A6-7000 versus 1066 on the Celeron P4600 — the A6-7000 supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7000 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-7000) vs 2 (Celeron P4600). Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A6-7000) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Celeron P4600).

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron P4600
Socket	FT3	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+50%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	16+100%	8
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R4 Graphics (A6-7000) and Intel HD Graphics (Westmere) (Celeron P4600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A6-7000 rivals Pentium 3556U; Celeron P4600 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron P4600
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R4 Graphics	Intel HD Graphics (Westmere)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A6-7000 was priced at $100, while the Celeron P4600 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($100 vs $86), Celeron P4600 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A6-7000 delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 11.2 pts/$ for the Celeron P4600 — making the Celeron P4600 the 11.3% better value option.

Feature	A6-7000	Celeron P4600
MSRP	$100	$86-14%
Performance per Dollar	10.0	11.2+12%
Release Date	2014	2010

Search A6-7000 on Amazon

Search Celeron P4600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.