Quadro 7000 vs Radeon 3000
Quadro 7000
Popular choices:
Radeon 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 7000 is positioned at rank #398 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3000 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon 3000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 7000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 7000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3476.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3476.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3476.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+1100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $300 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 484.2% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3000.
| Insight | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+484.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 7000 and Radeon 3000
Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Radeon 3000
The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro 7000 scores 3,505 versus the Radeon 3000's 98 — the Quadro 7000 leads by 3476.5%. The Quadro 7000 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 7000) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000).
| Feature | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,505+3477% | 98 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.3322 TFLOPS+7% | 1.247 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+600% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 7000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3000 has 512 MB. The Quadro 7000 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Quadro 7000) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3000) — the Quadro 7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 7000 draws 204W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 121.3% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 7000) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 204W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.2+760% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 7000 launched at $14499 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The Radeon 3000 costs 83.7% less ($251 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.7 (Quadro 7000) vs 2.0 (Radeon 3000) — the Quadro 7000 offers 485% better value. The Radeon 3000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro 7000 | Radeon 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $14499 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $49-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.7+485% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GF110 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | May 2 2012 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #541 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 7000 and Radeon 3000
