Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 7000

2012

Why buy it

✅41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2799.8% HIGHER MSRP
$14,499 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌172% higher power demand at 204W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $13,999 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2775% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 204W, a 129W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 7000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 7000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,505 vs 3,475), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $13,999 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $14,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2775% (7.0 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 7000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 7000 vs Radeon Pro 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 7000

The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.

Radeon Pro 560

The Radeon Pro 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,475 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 7000 scores 3,505 and the Radeon Pro 560 reaches 3,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 7000 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 7000) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560). Raw compute: 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560).

Feature	Quadro 7000	Radeon Pro 560
G3D Mark Score	3,505	3,475
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	512	1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.3322 TFLOPS	1.858 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	64	64
L1 Cache	896 KB+250%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 7000	Radeon Pro 560
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 7000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 560 carries 2 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 7000 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 7000	Radeon Pro 560
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 7000 draws 204W versus the Radeon Pro 560's 75W — a 92.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 7000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 7000	Radeon Pro 560
TDP	204W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	17.2	46.3+169%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro 7000 came in at $14499, while the Radeon Pro 560 launched at $500. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560 was 96.6% cheaper ($13999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro 7000) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro 560) — the Radeon Pro 560 offers 3400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro 7000	Radeon Pro 560
MSRP	$14499	$500-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	7.0+3400%
Codename	GF110	Polaris 21
Release	May 2 2012	April 18 2017
Ranking	#541	#543

Search Quadro 7000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.