Quadro 7000 vs Quadro K2200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 7000 vs Quadro K2200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 7000 vs Quadro K2200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 7000

2012

Why buy it

✅77.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌213.8% higher power demand at 204W vs 65W.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 204W, a 139W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 7000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 7000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2200M instead at 3,535 vs 3,505, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 7000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro 7000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro 7000 vs Quadro K2200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 7000

The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 7000 scores 3,505 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 7000 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 7000) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M). Raw compute: 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000) vs 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M).

Feature	Quadro 7000	Quadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score	3,505	3,535
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.3322 TFLOPS+56%	0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40
L1 Cache	896 KB+180%	320 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 7000	Quadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 7000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M carries 4 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 7000 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200M) — the Quadro K2200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 7000	Quadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 7000 draws 204W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 103.3% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 7000) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 7000	Quadro K2200M
TDP	204W	65W-68%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	17.2	54.4+216%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2200M (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro 7000	Quadro K2200M
MSRP	$14499	—
Codename	GF110	GM107
Release	May 2 2012	July 19 2014
Ranking	#541	#539

Search Quadro 7000 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.