GRID K520 vs Quadro 7000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Quadro 7000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K520 vs Quadro 7000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $10,900 less on MSRP ($3,599 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 304.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro 7000

2012

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
302.9% HIGHER MSRP
$14,499 MSRPvs$3,599 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,505), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $10,900 cheaper on MSRP at $3,599 vs $14,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 304.1% (1.0 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GRID K520 vs Quadro 7000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Quadro 7000

The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro 7000
G3D Mark Score	3,516	3,505
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2+200%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+72%	1.3322 TFLOPS
ROPs	32 ×2	48+50%
TMUs	128 ×2+100%	64
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro 7000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and 64-bit on the Quadro 7000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GRID K520) vs 768 KB (Quadro 7000) — the Quadro 7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro 7000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 9.8% difference. The Quadro 7000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro 7000
TDP	225W	204W-9%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.6	17.2+10%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K520 came in at $3599, while the Quadro 7000 launched at $14499. On MSRP, GRID K520 was 75.2% cheaper ($10900 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID K520) vs 0.2 (Quadro 7000) — the GRID K520 offers 400% better value. The newer card here is GRID K520 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro 7000
MSRP	$3599-75%	$14499
Performance per Dollar	1.0+400%	0.2
Codename	GK104	GF110
Release	July 23 2013	May 2 2012
Ranking	#540	#541

Search GRID K520 on Amazon

Search Quadro 7000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.