GRID K520 vs Quadro K2200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Quadro K2200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID K520 vs Quadro K2200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K2200M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (3,535 vs 3,516), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID K520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID K520 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K2200M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K520 vs Quadro K2200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M).

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score	3,516	3,535
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536 ×2+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS ×2+168%	0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs	32 ×2+100%	16
TMUs	128 ×2+220%	40
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID K520 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K520) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200M) — the Quadro K2200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro K2200M
TDP	225W	65W-71%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	15.6	54.4+249%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2200M (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID K520	Quadro K2200M
MSRP	$3599	—
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	July 23 2013	July 19 2014
Ranking	#540	#539

Search GRID K520 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.