GRID K520 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

GRID K520

2013Core: 745 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1287 MHz

GRID K520 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID K520 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID K520

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 4455.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,599 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $3,520 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4435% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • GRID K520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID K520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (3,516 vs 3,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GRID K520 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,520 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $3,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4435% (44.3 vs 1.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID K520 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID K520 vs Radeon RX 550 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

AMD

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1287 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points. Launch price was $79.99.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K520 scores 3,516 and the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K520 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K520) vs 640 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520) vs 1.647 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)).

FeatureGRID K520Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
3,516
3,500
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2+140%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS ×2+39%
1.647 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2+100%
16
TMUs
128 ×2+220%
40
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID K520 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureGRID K520Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID K520 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 550 (móvel).

FeatureGRID K520Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K520 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 550 (móvel)'s 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon RX 550 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K520) vs 350W (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID K520Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
15.6
70.0+349%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID K520 came in at $3599, while the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) launched at $79. On MSRP, Radeon RX 550 (móvel) was 97.8% cheaper ($3520 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.0 (GRID K520) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 550 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 550 (móvel) offers 4330% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550 (móvel) (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K520Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP
$3599
$79-98%
Performance per Dollar
1.0
44.3+4330%
Codename
GK104
Lexa
Release
July 23 2013
July 2 2017
Ranking
#540
#614

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.