GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
VS
GRID K520

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs GRID K520

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013Core: 771 MHzBoost: 797 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti
VS

GRID K520

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060•RTX 3060•RTX 4060 Ti•RTX 3070•GTX 1650•RTX 3060 Ti•RTX 4070•RTX 3050•RX 7600•RTX 4070 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
122
3,569
+1.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 SE
brand logoGeForce MX250
brand logoGeForce GTX 560
brand logoGeForce GTX 470
brand logoGeForce GTX 780
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GRID K520
225
3,516
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M
brand logoGeForce MX330
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 860M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is positioned at rank 102 and the GRID K520 is on rank 350, so the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#92
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
259%
#94
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
234%
#95
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
234%
#99
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
213%
#100
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
211%
#102
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
99%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
98%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
97%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
96%
#114
Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP: $179|Avg: $40
93%
#116
GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
91%
#117
GeForce MX570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $120
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K520

#335
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
15074%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
100%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
99%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
97%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
96%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
93%
#356
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
93%
#357
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
92%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
91%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
90%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
88%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
83%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID K520.

InsightGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
Performance
✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition Benchmark Check

GRID K520 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low130 FPS
medium95 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra54 FPS
1440p
low83 FPS
medium60 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra34 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium28 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080p
low137 FPS
medium97 FPS
high74 FPS
ultra55 FPS
1440p
low84 FPS
medium59 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra33 FPS
4K
low37 FPS
medium28 FPS
high23 FPS
ultra15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low161 FPS
medium118 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra49 FPS
1440p
low91 FPS
medium69 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra28 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium26 FPS
high19 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080p
low158 FPS
medium118 FPS
high93 FPS
ultra47 FPS
1440p
low100 FPS
medium70 FPS
high47 FPS
ultra28 FPS
4K
low36 FPS
medium25 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra13 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low161 FPS
medium128 FPS
high107 FPS
ultra80 FPS
1440p
low120 FPS
medium96 FPS
high80 FPS
ultra60 FPS
4K
low80 FPS
medium64 FPS
high54 FPS
ultra40 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080p
low158 FPS
medium127 FPS
high105 FPS
ultra79 FPS
1440p
low119 FPS
medium95 FPS
high79 FPS
ultra59 FPS
4K
low79 FPS
medium63 FPS
high53 FPS
ultra40 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low161 FPS
medium128 FPS
high107 FPS
ultra72 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS
medium73 FPS
high57 FPS
ultra37 FPS
4K
low37 FPS
medium29 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080p
low158 FPS
medium127 FPS
high105 FPS
ultra72 FPS
1440p
low82 FPS
medium70 FPS
high55 FPS
ultra36 FPS
4K
low35 FPS
medium29 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra12 FPS
Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and GRID K520

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the GRID K520 reaches 3,516 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the GRID K520 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1,536 (GRID K520). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K520).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
G3D Mark Score
3,569+2%
3,516
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1536 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS+7%
2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
128
128 ×2
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID K520). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs NVENC 1 (GRID K520). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GRID K520).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
Encoder
NVENC
NVENC 1
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the GRID K520's 225W — a 59.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (GRID K520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionGRID K520
TDP
122W-46%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
105mm
267mm
Height
82mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
29.3+88%
15.6