GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs T400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013Core: 771 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS

T400

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs T400 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 20.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
  • 306.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 30W.

T400

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 122W, a 92W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T400 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,609 vs 3,569), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs T400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the T400 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionT400
G3D Mark Score
3,569
3,609+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS+124%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1425 MHz+79%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
384 KB+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionT400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the T400 carries 4 GB. T400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 64-bit on the T400. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1 MB (T400) — the T400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionT400
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the T400's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionT400
TDP
122W
30W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
105mm
Height
82mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
29.3
120.3+311%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionT400
MSRP
$180
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
November 8 2013
May 6 2021
Ranking
#625
#532

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.