GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013Core: 771 MHzBoost: 797 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2200M

2014Core: 667 MHz
Similar parts
····

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Why buy it

  • 33.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 65W.

Quadro K2200M

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 65W instead of 122W, a 57W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1% in PassMark G3D (3,569 vs 3,535), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2200M

The Quadro K2200M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,535 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the Quadro K2200M reaches 3,535 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2200M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 640 (Quadro K2200M). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 0.8538 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionQuadro K2200M
G3D Mark Score
3,569
3,535
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+140%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.448 TFLOPS+187%
0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+220%
40
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionQuadro K2200M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200M carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200M) — the Quadro K2200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionQuadro K2200M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the Quadro K2200M's 65W — a 61% difference. The Quadro K2200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (Quadro K2200M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet EditionQuadro K2200M
TDP
122W
65W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
105mm
Height
82mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
29.3
54.4+86%