
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

GeForce GTX 870M
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs GeForce GTX 870M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs GeForce GTX 870M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs GeForce GTX 870M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌22% higher power demand at 122W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 870M
2014Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 122W, a 22W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs GeForce GTX 870M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

GeForce GTX 870M
The GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,536 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the GeForce GTX 870M reaches 3,536 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 870M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 870M). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 2.599 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 870M). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,569 | 3,536 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+14% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.448 TFLOPS | 2.599 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 967 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 128+14% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+14% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 870M carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX 870M gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 870M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 870M) — the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 870M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 870M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 870M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the GeForce GTX 870M's 100W — a 19.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 870M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 870M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | GeForce GTX 870M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 100W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 105mm | — |
| Height | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 29.3 | 35.4+21% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













