G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

2013

Why buy it

✅26.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Measures 105mm instead of 203mm, a 98mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌79.4% higher power demand at 122W vs 68W.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 68W instead of 122W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌93.3% longer card at 203mm vs 105mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K2200 instead at 3,580 vs 3,569, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K2200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the Quadro K2200 reaches 3,580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 797 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	3,569	3,580
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.448 TFLOPS+70%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	797 MHz	1124 MHz+41%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 2 MB (Quadro K2200) — the Quadro K2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
Encoder	NVENC	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 56.8% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 105mm vs 203mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
TDP	122W	68W-44%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	105mm	203mm
Height	82mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	29.3	52.6+80%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2200 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition	Quadro K2200
MSRP	—	$500
Codename	GK104	GM107
Release	November 8 2013	July 22 2014
Ranking	#625	#534

Search GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.