
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition

Quadro 7000
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro 7000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro 7000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro 7000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 204W, a 82W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 7000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $14,499 MSRP).
Quadro 7000
2012Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($14,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌67.2% higher power demand at 204W vs 122W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition vs Quadro 7000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.

Quadro 7000
The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition scores 3,569 and the Quadro 7000 reaches 3,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is built on Kepler while the Quadro 7000 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 512 (Quadro 7000). Raw compute: 2.448 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,569+2% | 3,505 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.448 TFLOPS+84% | 1.3322 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 896 KB+600% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 7000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 7000 carries 6 GB. Quadro 7000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition and 64-bit on the Quadro 7000. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 768 KB (Quadro 7000) — the Quadro 7000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition draws 122W versus the Quadro 7000's 204W — a 50.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition) vs 350W (Quadro 7000). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-40% | 204W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 105mm | — |
| Height | 82mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.3+70% | 17.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680M KY_Bullet Edition | Quadro 7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $14499 |
| Codename | GK104 | GF110 |
| Release | November 8 2013 | May 2 2012 |
| Ranking | #625 | #541 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














