GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Popular choices:
GRID K520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
GRID K520
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013GRID K520
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,599 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 765M SLI better than GRID K520?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 15 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GRID K520
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.
GRID K520
GRID K520
The GRID K520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI scores 3,614 and the GRID K520 reaches 3,516 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is built on Kepler while the GRID K520 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 1,536 (GRID K520).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,614+3% | 3,516 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 ×2 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI draws 130W versus the GRID K520's 225W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 350W (GRID K520). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-42% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8+78% | 15.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GRID K520
