GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅8.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GTX 765M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI scores 3,614 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,614 | 3,678+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 560X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M SLI and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 53.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 75W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8 | 49.0+76% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | — | Polaris 21 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #486 | #528 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















