
GeForce GTX 765M SLI

GeForce MX450
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce MX450 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce MX450 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce MX450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌420% higher power demand at 130W vs 25W.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 765M SLI is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 130W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GeForce MX450 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI scores 3,614 and the GeForce MX450 reaches 3,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is built on Kepler while the GeForce MX450 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 896 (GeForce MX450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,614 | 3,720+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+71% | 896 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M SLI and 64-bit on the GeForce MX450.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI draws 130W versus the GeForce MX450's 25W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 350W (GeForce MX450). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 25W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 27.8 | 148.8+435% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 765M SLI | GeForce MX450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Codename | — | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | August 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #486 | #523 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














