GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 4100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌160% higher power demand at 130W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅10.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 130W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,682 vs 3,614), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 765M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 765M SLI has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI scores 3,614 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,614	3,682+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 765M SLI and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI draws 130W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	130W	50W-62%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	27.8	73.6+165%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4100 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 765M SLI	Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	—	Baffin
Release	May 30 2013	November 10 2016
Ranking	#486	#526

Search GeForce GTX 765M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.