
FirePro S7150
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro S7150
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
FirePro S7150
2016GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro S7150 better than GeForce GTX 765M SLI?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 765M SLI still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and GeForce GTX 765M SLI

FirePro S7150
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,614 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GeForce GTX 765M SLI reaches 3,614 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 765M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 765M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770+4% | 3,614 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro S7150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 765M SLI has 2 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 765M SLI's 130W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 765M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 130W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 27.8+11% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7150 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GeForce GTX 765M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | — |
| Codename | Tonga | — |
| Release | February 1 2016 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #521 | #486 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












