FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 680M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 680M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 680M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (3,836 vs 3,770), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 680M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro S7150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro S7150 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 680M has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 680M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M).

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	3,770	3,836+2%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.768 TFLOPS+12%	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 680M carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and System on the Radeon 680M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (Radeon 680M) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12_2 (Radeon 680M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
DirectX	12	12_2
Max Displays	0	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs VCN 3.1.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCN 3.1
Decoder	UVD 5.0	VCN 3.1
Codecs	H.264,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.1	76.7+206%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 680M (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	FirePro S7150	Radeon 680M
MSRP	$2399	—
Codename	Tonga	Rembrandt+
Release	February 1 2016	January 3 2023
Ranking	#521	#512

Search FirePro S7150 on Amazon

Search Radeon 680M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.