FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 880M

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

2014Core: 954 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 880M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 880M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 23% higher power demand at 150W vs 122W.
  • 24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

GeForce GTX 880M

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 122W instead of 150W, a 28W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 880M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (3,826 vs 3,770), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTX 880M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GTX 880M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 880M

The GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,826 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GeForce GTX 880M reaches 3,826 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 880M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 880M). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 3.05 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 880M).

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
G3D Mark Score
3,770
3,826+1%
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+33%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+24%
3.05 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 880M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro S7150 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 880M carries 8 GB. GeForce GTX 880M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 880M.

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12_0 (GeForce GTX 880M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 880M). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
UVD 5.0
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 880M's 122W — a 20.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 880M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 880M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
TDP
150W
122W-19%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1
31.4+25%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro S7150 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro S7150GeForce GTX 880M
MSRP
$2399
Codename
Tonga
GK104
Release
February 1 2016
March 12 2014
Ranking
#521
#514

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.