Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P620

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum

FirePro S7150
4 GB 150
3,770
+1.9%
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
Quadro P620
2 GB 40
3,698
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M SLI
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GT 755M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1311.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,399 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • ❌275% higher power demand at 150W vs 40W.
  • ❌66.2% longer card at 241mm vs 145mm.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,229 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1284.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 40W instead of 150W, a 110W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 145mm instead of 241mm, a 96mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro S7150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (3,770 vs 3,698), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,229 cheaper on MSRP at $170 vs $2,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1284.2% (21.8 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. FirePro S7150 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro S7150 vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620).

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score
3,770+2%
3,698
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+155%
1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
512 KB+167%
192 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the Quadro P620. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
DirectX
12
12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.4+17%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 5.0
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
TDP
150W
40W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
145mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
25.1
92.5+269%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 92.9% cheaper ($2229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 1262.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureFirePro S7150Quadro P620
MSRP
$2399
$170-93%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
21.8+1262%
Codename
Tonga
GP107
Release
February 1 2016
February 1 2018
Ranking
#521
#524
Search FirePro S7150 on AmazonSearch Quadro P620 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.