Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S7150 vs T400 4GB

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S7150 vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

FirePro S7150
4 GB 150
3,770
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
T400 4GB
2 GB 30
3,803
+0.9%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 470M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960M
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 12GB
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1408.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
  • ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1422% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • ✅FirePro S7150 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T400 4GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,803 vs 3,770), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 4GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,240 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $2,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1422% (23.9 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro S7150 vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB).

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,770
3,803
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+244%
1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+33%
384 KB
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
UVD 5.0
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
TDP
150W
30W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
156mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
—
Perf/Watt
25.1
126.8+405%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 93.4% cheaper ($2240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 1393.7% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2016).

FeatureFirePro S7150T400 4GB
MSRP
$2399
$159-93%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
23.9+1394%
Codename
Tonga
TU117
Release
February 1 2016
May 6 2021
Ranking
#521
#518
Search FirePro S7150 on AmazonSearch T400 4GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.