
FirePro S7150

GRID V100-2Q
FirePro S7150 vs GRID V100-2Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S7150 vs GRID V100-2Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro S7150 vs GRID V100-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S7150
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $7,601 less on MSRP ($2,399 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 312.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GRID V100-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌316.8% HIGHER MSRP$10,000 MSRPvs$2,399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7150 vs GRID V100-2Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

GRID V100-2Q
The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the GRID V100-2Q reaches 3,811 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GRID V100-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770 | 3,811+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.768 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+28% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100-2Q carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro S7150) vs 2 MB (GRID V100-2Q) — the GRID V100-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the GRID V100-2Q's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (GRID V100-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+49% | 16.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the GRID V100-2Q launched at $10000. On MSRP, FirePro S7150 was 76% cheaper ($7601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 0.4 (GRID V100-2Q) — the FirePro S7150 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is FirePro S7150 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | GRID V100-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399-76% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.6+300% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Tonga | GM204 |
| Release | February 1 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #521 | #433 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














