FirePro S7150
Radeon 840M
FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 840M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 840M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 840M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro S7150
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro S7150 vs Radeon 840M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 256 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770 | 3,803 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+700% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 840M carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and System on the Radeon 840M.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1 | 126.8+405% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 840M (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | — |
| Codename | Tonga | Krackan Point |
| Release | February 1 2016 | June 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #521 | #516 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S7150 and Radeon 840M
