Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M485X

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro S7150

2016Core: 920 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

2016Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M485X Performance Spectrum

FirePro S7150
4 GB 150
3,770
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon RX 560X
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800
Radeon R9 M485X
2 GB 250
3,801
+0.8%
brand logoRadeon R9 M385
brand logoRadeon HD 6850 X2
brand logoRadeon R7 260
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon R9 290 / 390
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro S7150

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    433.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,399 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M485X

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,949 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 437.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M485X is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (3,801 vs 3,770), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro S7150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M485X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,949 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $2,399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 437.5% (8.4 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M485X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro S7150 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro S7150

The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
G3D Mark Score
3,770
3,801
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.768 TFLOPS+27%
2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128
128
L1 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro S7150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M485X carries 2 GB. FirePro S7150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro S7150 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
Encoder
VCE 3.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
UVD 5.0
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
TDP
150W-40%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
241mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
1
—
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
25.1+65%
15.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro S7150 came in at $2399, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M485X was 81.2% cheaper ($1949 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.6 (FirePro S7150) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Radeon R9 M485X offers 425% better value.

FeatureFirePro S7150Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP
$2399
$450-81%
Performance per Dollar
1.6
8.4+425%
Codename
Tonga
Amethyst
Release
February 1 2016
May 15 2016
Ranking
#521
#519
Search FirePro S7150 on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 M485X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.