
FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M485X

FirePro S7150
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro S7150 is positioned at rank 315 and the Radeon R9 M485X is on rank 393, so the FirePro S7150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7150
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M485X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7150 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M485X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M485X holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $459), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 208.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+208.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($459) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M485X

FirePro S7150
The FirePro S7150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 920 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,770 points. Launch price was $2,399.

Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro S7150 scores 3,770 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro S7150 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro S7150) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 3.768 TFLOPS (FirePro S7150) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,770 | 3,801 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.768 TFLOPS+27% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro S7150 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB. The FirePro S7150 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro S7150) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (FirePro S7150) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (FirePro S7150) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro S7150 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 50% difference. The FirePro S7150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro S7150) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+65% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro S7150 launched at $2399 MSRP and currently averages $459, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 and now averages $150. The Radeon R9 M485X costs 67.3% less ($309 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (FirePro S7150) vs 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Radeon R9 M485X offers 208.5% better value.
| Feature | FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2399 | $450-81% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $459 | $150-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 25.3+209% |
| Codename | Tonga | Amethyst |
| Release | February 1 2016 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #521 | #519 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















